Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 21:18:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by batman on Dec 7, 2018 21:49:50 GMT
If the current political climate remains the same, when W dies (hopefully many, many years from now) it's going to be fascinating to hear the same reporters and commentators who compared him to Hitler, called him a war criminal and a heartless, idiotic monster, suddenly fawning over him and saying what a great guy he was. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 22:49:21 GMT
You can count on Slate to be consistent. And Pierce.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2018 23:50:52 GMT
Sooooooo...... How about that Rex Tillerson guy?
|
|
|
|
Post by formervanbboy on Dec 8, 2018 2:56:39 GMT
Apparently there's just no political news to comment on today.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 3:13:18 GMT
Apparently there's just no political news to comment on today. I thought about it, but I really didn’t want to get into a five-page discussion about how this means they don’t have anything on Individual-1 because Cohen would have gotten no time if he had given them anything. YankeeFan fatigue I guess. |
|
|
|
Post by Wolfenstein on Dec 8, 2018 4:05:12 GMT
Another round of articles about how THIS is the end. Goody.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 4:44:26 GMT
Apparently there's just no political news to comment on today. We’re conceding this one. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 4:45:26 GMT
So Ocasek-Cortez hints that she will issue a retaliatory subpoena at Donald Jr. for trolling her.
Not a great move.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 4:48:46 GMT
So Ocasek-Cortez hints that she will issue a retaliatory subpoena at Donald Jr. for trolling her. Not a great move. Eh, it’s banter. It was funny. Don Jr. is such a damn idiot. |
|
|
|
Post by JC on Dec 8, 2018 6:02:57 GMT
So Ocasek-Cortez hints that she will issue a retaliatory subpoena at Donald Jr. for trolling her. Not a great move. Are there any great moves? It’s right out of the Trump playbook. |
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Dec 8, 2018 13:54:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by xanadu on Dec 8, 2018 14:08:40 GMT
It would be worth the $77.80 if Dancing Barry showed up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 15:43:35 GMT
If you can get to LA, I will pay for you to attend this and ask/shout your Webb Hubbel questions. |
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Dec 8, 2018 17:09:45 GMT
There seem to be two headlines coming out of the Cohen filing. One says that he HAD CONTACT WITH A RUSSIAN AS FAR BACK AS 2015!!!!! The other is that he participated in a crime AT THE DIRECTION OF INDIVIDUAL-1!!!!! And then the SDNY throws in this:
“While many Americans who desired a particular outcome to the election knocked on doors, toiled at phone banks, or found any number of other legal ways to make their voices heard, Cohen sought to influence the election from the shadows,” the New York-based prosecutors wrote.
“Cohen deceived the voting public by hiding alleged facts that he believed would have had a substantial effect on the election,” they added.www.politico.com/story/2018/12/07/michael-cohen-should-receive-a-substantial-prison-sentence-prosecutors-say-1052058Holy shit people! Connect the dots. It's obvious that Cohen colluded with Russia, at the direction of Trump, to influence the election. It's the collusion smoking gun we've been waiting for! Except it's not. The 2015 contact was an unsolicited email from a Russian weightlifter, who is not involved in real estate development, or politics, and has no known ties to Putin, which was not followed up on. The "crime" involving Individual-1 was the payments to the porn star and the playboy model that we've know about for months. At best, it's a campaign finance violation. And, though the got Cohen to plead to it as part of his deal, it's silly to think that electoral considerations would be the only motivation for Trump to want to keep these women quiet. Good luck trying to bring a case against Trump for those payments. So, in conclusion, NO COLLUSION. It's a smear job, and a joke. |
|
