Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2018 15:59:30 GMT
Now there's a fucking "IA" at the end of LBGTQ? It's getting to be a bit much. What does the "IA" stand for? I’ll bet the A stands for asexual. I hope not, because that raises all sorts of questions about what merits being a protected class and what doesn’t. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2018 16:06:58 GMT
Did Google get taken off your machines or something?
The letters LGBTQIA refer to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, and asexual or allied.
Intersexual and intersectional, are those related? And allied, is that what used to be called "fruitflies" -- straight women who hang around gay men?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2018 16:08:23 GMT
Did Google get taken off your machines or something? The letters LGBTQIA refer to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, and asexual or allied.Intersexual and intersectional, are those related? And allied, is that what used to be called "fruitflies" -- straight women who hang around gay men? Fag hags? |
|
|
|
Post by xanadu on Nov 20, 2018 16:18:55 GMT
Did Google get taken off your machines or something? The letters LGBTQIA refer to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, and asexual or allied.Intersexual and intersectional, are those related? And allied, is that what used to be called "fruitflies" -- straight women who hang around gay men? Not fucking looking up LGBTQIA ... But ya may as well fucking add an F for those Furries! vimeo.com/114533913?ref=tw-share |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2018 16:25:18 GMT
So, this term is advocating for special protection for those who have an absence of sexuality and those who have gay friends?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2018 16:38:08 GMT
So, this term is advocating for special protection for those who have an absence of sexuality and those who have gay friends? It's the Dems trying to win back suburban dads. |
|
|
|
Post by guyincognito on Nov 20, 2018 17:36:36 GMT
If only they could have known this about her earlier. "Allowing"? That's rich. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2018 23:28:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Nov 20, 2018 23:46:20 GMT
But what president hasn't commandeered law enforcement to target his political enemies?
LOL. That's rich, considering the previous administration's DOJ launched an investigation into the Trump campaign, based on unproven, unverified, paid for, political opposition research, and were not forthcoming the FISC Judge when presenting the evidence. They used sketchy, paid, confidential informants to target Paige, Papadopoulos and Sam Clovis. Let me know when Trump does that to Clinton, Comey, or any political opponent. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2018 23:52:06 GMT
LMAO. Our intelligence agencies said we had Russian agents, so we went after Russian agents. Good analogy!
Damn. I thought you’d give us this one and prove Don right that you’re a Republican and not a Trumper.
|
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Nov 20, 2018 23:56:06 GMT
LMAO. Our intelligence agencies said we had Russian agents, so we went after Russian agents. Good analogy! Damn. I thought you’d give us this one and prove Don right that you’re a Republican and not a Trumper. Were Paige, Papadopoulos or Clovis Russian agents? None have been charges as such. Paige had previously worked with the FBI to convict Russian agents. What evidence did our intelligence agencies have, other than political research -- which was false -- to makes such claims? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2018 0:06:27 GMT
What political research was false? The Steele dossier is not false. Much of it is unproven. Some of it is proven. But it isn't "false."
Anyway, I can see you're off the "down is up" deep end here and are willing to consider it completely normal for a president to order the prosecution of his chief political rival and his No. 1 investigator. It says a great deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by xanadu on Nov 21, 2018 0:17:29 GMT
Maybe he did, maybe he didn't.
Lol, that's YF's boy!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2018 0:22:59 GMT
Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. Lol, that's YF's boy! Yeah, I put it on the Mister Bone Saw running thread, but it belongs here too. ===== He was a journalist, after all. And those are the enemies of the people. Plus, American intelligence or the word of a dictator, you gotta go with the dictator, right? More honest. In Extraordinary Statement, Trump Stands With Saudis Despite Khashoggi Killing“It could very well be that the crown prince had knowledge of this tragic event — maybe he did and maybe he didn’t!” Mr. Trump said in a remarkable, eight-paragraph, exclamation-point laden statement that appeared calculated to end debate over the American response to Mr. Khashoggi’s killing. “We may never know all of the facts surrounding the murder of Mr. Jamal Khashoggi,” Mr. Trump said in the statement. “In any case, our relationship is with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” |
|
|
|
Post by xanadu on Nov 21, 2018 12:28:53 GMT
They're especially chippy today. |
|
