|
|
Post by Elderly man, very poor memory on Nov 7, 2019 4:53:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Nov 7, 2019 5:00:48 GMT
When you turn to the random tweets to make a point, you’ve already lost. Like starting a presentation with “Webster’s defines ...”
|
|
|
|
Post by Elderly man, very poor memory on Nov 7, 2019 5:36:02 GMT
When your "whistleblower" is in this photo, you can stop pretending he has no bias.  |
|
|
|
Post by btexpress on Nov 7, 2019 13:53:46 GMT
What I really love is how Trump blew up Schiff's plan for weeks of obfuscation and lying innuendo by almost immediately releasing the transcript of the phone call. The Dems have been running around like head-free (and, as usual, brain-free) chickens since. Let's play a game. Read the "transcript" out loud, and tell me how long it takes. I did. Took me 9 minutes and 44 seconds. It was a 30-minute phone call. See the problem here? |
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Nov 7, 2019 14:00:57 GMT
The whistleblower was identified as a leaker as early as 2017, and the media has been working to protect him the whole time: On June 11, alt-right blogger Mike Cernovich published an article attacking an assistant to National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, claiming the previously low-profile civil servant wanted to “sabotage” President Donald Trump.
The piece described Eric Ciaramella as “pro-Ukraine and anti-Russia” and alleged, with no evidence, that he was possibly responsible for high-level leaks. The response to the piece included online threats of violence against Ciaramella, which contributed to his decision to leave his job at the National Security Council a few weeks early, according to two sources familiar with the situation.foreignpolicy.com/2017/07/10/trumps-trolls-are-waging-war-on-americas-civil-servants/ |
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Nov 7, 2019 14:08:54 GMT
The whistleblower was identified as a leaker as early as 2017, and the media has been working to protect him the whole time: On June 11, alt-right blogger Mike Cernovich published an article attacking an assistant to National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, claiming the previously low-profile civil servant wanted to “sabotage” President Donald Trump.
The piece described Eric Ciaramella as “pro-Ukraine and anti-Russia” and alleged, with no evidence, that he was possibly responsible for high-level leaks. The response to the piece included online threats of violence against Ciaramella, which contributed to his decision to leave his job at the National Security Council a few weeks early, according to two sources familiar with the situation.foreignpolicy.com/2017/07/10/trumps-trolls-are-waging-war-on-americas-civil-servants/In other words, you still have no evidence to support this claim. |
|
|
|
Post by xanadu on Nov 7, 2019 14:10:00 GMT
You like threats if they're related to your boy.
|
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Nov 7, 2019 14:31:42 GMT
In other words, you still have no evidence to support this claim. Don Jr. tweeted out a link to a Breitbart story yesterday that named the whistleblower. Normally, the media loves something like this. It gives them the opportunity to report on goings on around the story. But, while someone like Jake Tapper will allude to it, still no one is even reporting who was named. We're not getting a single, "ABC news has not been able to independently confirm the whistleblower's identity," quote. The reason for that, is they all know who he is. They can't claim that they aren't reporting his name because they don't know it. So, yes. The media has circled the wagons for this long time leaker. |
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Nov 7, 2019 14:36:18 GMT
In other words, you still have no evidence to support this claim. Don Jr. tweeted out a link to a Breitbart story yesterday that named the whistleblower. Normally, the media loves something like this. It gives them the opportunity to report on goings on around the story. But, while someone like Jake Tapper will allude to it, still no one is even reporting who was named. We're not getting a single, "ABC news has not been able to independently confirm the whistleblower's identity," quote. The reason for that, is they all know who he is. They can't claim that they aren't reporting his name because they don't know it. So, yes. The media has circled the wagons for this long time leaker.Everything you said up until the bolded part is correct. But the first five statements don't prove the sixth. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2019 14:41:53 GMT
Has anyone mentioned that even Fox News folks were told not to name the whistleblower?
|
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Nov 7, 2019 15:07:17 GMT
Has anyone mentioned that even Fox News folks were told not to name the whistleblower? I suspect no one wants to go first. But, if they all agree that they won't go first, that's effectively the same as all agreeing to not name him. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2019 15:29:46 GMT
I suspect no one wants to go first. That’s what the libtard Illuminati wants you to think. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2019 16:38:20 GMT
Why do we even care who the "whistleblower" is? It's the facts of what was whistleblown that matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Nov 7, 2019 16:40:56 GMT
Why do we even care who the "whistleblower" is? It's the facts of what was whistleblown that matter. Because sometimes all you have left is character assassination and ad hominem attacks. |
|
|
|
Post by Wolfenstein on Nov 7, 2019 17:07:59 GMT
Why do we even care who the "whistleblower" is? It's the facts of what was whistleblown that matter. Because sometimes all you have left is character assassination and ad hominem attacks. For some, that happens more often than for others. |
|
:format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-919624-1312618814.jpeg.jpg)
