|
Post by bigpern23 on Sept 27, 2019 19:38:51 GMT
So it's your assertion that "routine" phone calls made by any president — including future Democratic Presidents — which do not not contain anything remotely sensitive from a national security perspective, are and should be routinely stored on an above-top secret classified server, and it's a scandal if they are not? Hmm. Interesting. A. The conversations are all classified. 2. They were stored where they were safe. C. They haven’t leaked since they’ve been stored in this manner. 4. Scandal! 1. I'm sure you're aware there are varying degrees of classification. B. They were stored in a place normally used to store information with national security implications, and there were none here (except for, you know, the ones created by the President leveraging his office for political gain). III. True, whistleblowing is different than leaking. D. IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKER!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 20:09:07 GMT
D. IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKER! Nice to have Rep. Rashida T. with us! Welcome!
|
|
|
Post by Dr Boom 70 on Sept 27, 2019 20:29:59 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 21:43:34 GMT
Why is Peter King driving?
|
|
|
Post by Dr Boom 70 on Sept 27, 2019 21:54:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Sept 27, 2019 21:55:45 GMT
I think I might make that my ringtone.
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Sept 27, 2019 21:56:33 GMT
The media/democrat campaign to get Bill Barr to recuse himself from this is hysterical, and points to the motive of the entire hit.
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Sept 27, 2019 22:22:29 GMT
The media/democrat campaign to get Bill Barr to recuse himself from this is hysterical, and points to the motive of the entire hit. You really don’t think he did anything wrong, do you?
|
|
|
Post by sharky, Hunter’s text buddy on Sept 27, 2019 22:57:23 GMT
The media/democrat campaign to get Bill Barr to recuse himself from this is hysterical, and points to the motive of the entire hit. You really don’t think he did anything wrong, do you? “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and wouldn’t lose any voters, okay?”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 23:12:33 GMT
Remember when YF told us Bill Barr was a mainstream Republican and didn't get the job because he was Trump's stooge?
Good times.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 23:24:01 GMT
The media/democrat campaign to get Bill Barr to recuse himself from this is hysterical, and points to the motive of the entire hit. You really don’t think he did anything wrong, do you? His whole argument seems to be “They’re ALSO making a big deal out of other things!”, “LOL the media,” and “They’re being political!”
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Sept 27, 2019 23:28:02 GMT
The media/democrat campaign to get Bill Barr to recuse himself from this is hysterical, and points to the motive of the entire hit. You really don’t think he did anything wrong, do you? What was Blogo's line, when discussing -- on a federal wiretap -- filling Obama's Senate seat? "I've got this thing and it's fucking golden, and, uh, uh, I'm just not giving it up for fuckin' nothing. I'm not gonna do it."
Trump, sees every interaction as transactional. He's not giving up anything for fuckin' nothing. He's actually been pretty clear about that, publicly. Whether it's foreign aid, or access to American markets, he wants something in return. And, as long as you're asking for something in the nation's interests, and not your own interests, that's totally cool. I don't know enough about the law -- and there's apparently some question about whether you can put a value on opposition research -- but, I have no doubt that Trump felt like getting to the bottom of Crowdstrike, Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election, and whether Joe Biden's son got a sweetheart deal, in order to curry favor with his father, was in the nation's interest. And, since the DOJ is probing Ukraine's roll in the 2016 election, and since Biden's deal does look shady as fuck, it's hard for me to see how it could be argued that it wasn't. That it might also benefit Trump politically would be irrelevant. Now, if course Blago is still in jail for selling his golden thing, so we'll see. But, this is politics, and the pearl clutching is a little much.
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Sept 27, 2019 23:30:01 GMT
You really don’t think he did anything wrong, do you? “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and wouldn’t lose any voters, okay?” “The New York Times said he shot that man with a semi-automatic rifle LOL. It was a blot action! We deserve better from our media. Why are they trying to make Trump look bad?”
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Sept 27, 2019 23:31:18 GMT
Remember when YF told us Bill Barr was a mainstream Republican and didn't get the job because he was Trump's stooge? Good times. You think he's Trump's wingman?
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Sept 27, 2019 23:35:22 GMT
You really don’t think he did anything wrong, do you? What was Blogo's line, when discussing -- on a federal wiretap -- filling Obama's Senate seat? "I've got this thing and it's fucking golden, and, uh, uh, I'm just not giving it up for fuckin' nothing. I'm not gonna do it."
Trump, sees every interaction as transactional. He's not giving up anything for fuckin' nothing. He's actually been pretty clear about that, publicly. Whether it's foreign aid, or access to American markets, he wants something in return. And, as long as you're asking for something in the nation's interests, and not your own interests, that's totally cool. I don't know enough about the law -- and there's apparently some question about whether you can put a value on opposition research -- but, I have no doubt that Trump felt like getting to the bottom of Crowdstrike, Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election, and whether Joe Biden's son got a sweetheart deal, in order to curry favor with his father, was in the nation's interest. And, since the DOJ is probing Ukraine's roll in the 2016 election, and since Biden's deal does look shady as fuck, it's hard for me to see how it could be argued that it wasn't. That it might also benefit Trump politically would be irrelevant. Now, if course Blago is still in jail for selling his golden thing, so we'll see. But, this is politics, and the pearl clutching is a little much. So “no”? Your answer is no, he did nothing wrong? Seeking dirt on the Bidens, men who at present hold no office and have no influence on the direction of the country, was in the country’s best interest and not Trump’s? You’re working too hard for so little return.
|
|