|
|
Post by Elderly man, very poor memory on Oct 4, 2019 0:28:41 GMT
Right. And, he can get away with it, because the same bombastic shit has been used against him, and the mains stream media didn't fall on their fainting couches over it. if the media played it straight, he couldn't do it. But, instead, every lune from the previous administration is a contributor to CNN or MSNBC. “if the media played it straight, he couldn't do it.” Among the cutest things I’ve ever read. OK, you can post all the links from media outlets that called out Schiff for his stupendous stunt of a made-up conversation that he delivered from the well of the House last week. I'll wait right here. |
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Oct 4, 2019 0:58:56 GMT
“if the media played it straight, he couldn't do it.” Among the cutest things I’ve ever read. OK, you can post all the links from media outlets that called out Schiff for his stupendous stunt of a made-up conversation that he delivered from the well of the House last week. I'll wait right here. Such a triggered little snowflake. |
|
|
|
Post by Elderly man, very poor memory on Oct 4, 2019 1:00:15 GMT
OK, you can post all the links from media outlets that called out Schiff for his stupendous stunt of a made-up conversation that he delivered from the well of the House last week. I'll wait right here. Such a triggered little snowflake. So ... no links? |
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Oct 4, 2019 1:03:33 GMT
Such a triggered little snowflake. So ... no links? Have you tried crying about it? Might make you feel better. |
|
|
|
Post by bigpern23 on Oct 4, 2019 1:15:55 GMT
LOL. Not based on first hand knowledge either. Like the Ukraine report, it’s all part of the same strategy to take down the president. Trump administration officials dismissed the whistleblower’s complaint as flimsy because it is based on conversations with other government officials. But congressional Democrats were alarmed by the complaint, now circulating on Capitol Hill, and flagged it to a federal judge. They are also discussing whether to make it public.LOL. You know the Ukraine whistleblower had first-hand knowledge, right? The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community went so far as to issue a rebuttal to claims otherwise, in which he stated, "The whistleblower stated on the form that he or she possessed both first-hand and other information." He went on to say that he had "reviewed the information provided as well as other information gathered and determined that the complaint was both urgent and that it appeared credible." www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Documents/News/ICIG%20News/2019/September%2030%20-%20Statement%20on%20Processing%20of%20Whistleblower%20Complaints/ICIG%20Statement%20on%20Processing%20of%20Whistleblower%20Complaints.pdf |
|
|
|
Post by Elderly man, very poor memory on Oct 4, 2019 1:22:02 GMT
Have you tried crying about it? Might make you feel better. That doesn't appear to be a link. Tapping out? |
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Oct 4, 2019 1:29:03 GMT
Have you tried crying about it? Might make you feel better. That doesn't appear to be a link. Tapping out? I know they are being mean to daddy. But you are going to be OK. There will always be another racist moron to idolize. Just a few deep breaths. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2019 1:36:15 GMT
The shit these guys will work themselves into a lather over to avoid talking about Trump’s behavior is amazing.
|
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Oct 4, 2019 1:36:57 GMT
LOL. You know the Ukraine whistleblower had first-hand knowledge, right? The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community went so far as to issue a rebuttal to claims otherwise, in which he stated, " The whistleblower stated on the form that he or she possessed both first-hand and other information." He went on to say that he had "reviewed the information provided as well as other information gathered and determined that the complaint was both urgent and that it appeared credible."Read it again champ. That the whistleblower stated something on a form doesn't make it true. That the IG found the information credible doesn't mean it was first hand. So, if he/she had first hand info, I'd be interested to hear it, but as you probably know, when he/she first raised the issue, they didn't even know what foreign leader was involved. Here's the Times', The Daily podcast on the origins: Michael Barbaro
And what is the information that the C.I.A. officer has his colleague communicate to the top lawyers at the C.I.A.?
Julian Barnes
It’s very vague. The initial information that the colleague brings to the C.I.A.‘s top lawyer is that something has gone wrong. There’s been some impropriety in a call between Mr. Trump and a foreign leader. There’s no date, there’s no name of the foreign leader, there’s no country.www.nytimes.com/2019/09/30/podcasts/the-daily/whistleblower-complaint-cia.html |
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Oct 4, 2019 1:43:21 GMT
Look over here! There’s something slightly amiss! No, no, don’t look over there, at that growing list of impeachable offenses! That’s nothing! Look at this! The form was incomplete! INCOMPLETE!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2019 1:44:29 GMT
When is a transcript not a transcript? When it comes from the White House. Analysis of the ellipses and total word count suggests it’s very unlikely we’ve seen an actual transcript. www.salon.com/2019/10/03/how-much-is-missing-from-ukraine-transcript-former-officials-point-to-ellipses-odd-markings/The call between Trump and Zelensky measured at about 65 words per minute. Transcripts of Trump’s calls have been released in the past. A 24-minute call with then-Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull came in at 133 words per minute, while a 53-minute call with then-Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, using interpreters, clocked in at 102 words per minute.
. . .
Officials also cited “odd markings” on the partial transcript. For one, the transcript lacked a tracking number that indicates it had been circulated to senior officials for review. Instead of a “package” number, the memo released by the White House said “PkgNumberShort.”
The document also included classification markings that Situation Room officers do not typically use when creating a word-for-word transcript. |
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Oct 4, 2019 1:50:57 GMT
Look over here! There’s something slightly amiss! No, no, don’t look over there, at that growing list of impeachable offenses! That’s nothing! Look at this! The form was incomplete! INCOMPLETE! Ugh. I said that the IRS "whistleblower" like the CIA "whistleblower" didn't have first hand information. (And, that they were both efforts in the same strategy to take down the president.) You said the CIA wb did. I show that you were wrong, and you accuse me of deflecting. At least give me a fucking "fair enough". |
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Oct 4, 2019 1:52:40 GMT
When is a transcript not a transcript? When it comes from the White House. Analysis of the ellipses and total word count suggests it’s very unlikely we’ve seen an actual transcript. www.salon.com/2019/10/03/how-much-is-missing-from-ukraine-transcript-former-officials-point-to-ellipses-odd-markings/The call between Trump and Zelensky measured at about 65 words per minute. Transcripts of Trump’s calls have been released in the past. A 24-minute call with then-Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull came in at 133 words per minute, while a 53-minute call with then-Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, using interpreters, clocked in at 102 words per minute.
. . .
Officials also cited “odd markings” on the partial transcript. For one, the transcript lacked a tracking number that indicates it had been circulated to senior officials for review. Instead of a “package” number, the memo released by the White House said “PkgNumberShort.”
The document also included classification markings that Situation Room officers do not typically use when creating a word-for-word transcript.LOL. Who's trading in conspiracy theories now Kay? |
|
|
|
Post by TyWebb on Oct 4, 2019 1:53:57 GMT
Look over here! There’s something slightly amiss! No, no, don’t look over there, at that growing list of impeachable offenses! That’s nothing! Look at this! The form was incomplete! INCOMPLETE! Ugh. I said that the IRS "whistleblower" like the CIA "whistleblower" didn't have first hand information. (And, that they were both efforts in the same strategy to take down the president.) You said the CIA wb did. I show that you were wrong, and you accuse me of deflecting. At least give me a fucking "fair enough". Wrong person. But anyway, LOOK OVER THERE! NOT HERE! AND IF YOU DO LOOK OVER HERE, IT IS A CONSPIRACY. Seriously, you’ll be embarrassed one day by how deeply you were conned by your boy. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2019 1:57:11 GMT
When is a transcript not a transcript? When it comes from the White House. Analysis of the ellipses and total word count suggests it’s very unlikely we’ve seen an actual transcript. www.salon.com/2019/10/03/how-much-is-missing-from-ukraine-transcript-former-officials-point-to-ellipses-odd-markings/The call between Trump and Zelensky measured at about 65 words per minute. Transcripts of Trump’s calls have been released in the past. A 24-minute call with then-Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull came in at 133 words per minute, while a 53-minute call with then-Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, using interpreters, clocked in at 102 words per minute.
. . .
Officials also cited “odd markings” on the partial transcript. For one, the transcript lacked a tracking number that indicates it had been circulated to senior officials for review. Instead of a “package” number, the memo released by the White House said “PkgNumberShort.”
The document also included classification markings that Situation Room officers do not typically use when creating a word-for-word transcript.LOL. Who's trading in conspiracy theories now Kay? How is that a conspiracy theory? There aren’t enough words in that transcript for an alleged 30-minute conversation. Standard conservative play these days. When there’s nothing to argue, mock. That’s usually tony’s moron game. |
|
