Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2019 12:17:24 GMT
What do you think about the opinion piece? I don't subscribe to the WSJ anymore, so couldn't get through the paywall. Why do you hate when newspapers try to make money? |
|
|
|
Post by mizzougrad96 on Jul 11, 2019 12:24:51 GMT
I don't subscribe to the WSJ anymore, so couldn't get through the paywall. Why do you hate when newspapers try to make money? Because they didn't seem to care about it 15 years ago. |
|
|
|
Post by frantic on Jul 11, 2019 12:32:42 GMT
I don't subscribe to the WSJ anymore, so couldn't get through the paywall. Why do you hate when newspapers try to make money? Right? I waffle back and forth on it, but the WSJ is the one my wife fusses at me about when she looks over my expenses. Doesn't get mad about the NYT or the local paper, but I have usually gotten better rates on those. |
|
|
|
Post by lcjjdnh on Jul 11, 2019 12:39:01 GMT
Why do you hate when newspapers try to make money? Right? I waffle back and forth on it, but the WSJ is the one my wife fusses at me about when she looks over my expenses. Doesn't get mad about the NYT or the local paper, but I have usually gotten better rates on those. Love the WSJ but it is a bit pricey— but given who I assume subscribes lots of price insensitive subscribers. And no discount for online-only subscriptions, unlike the Times (which is truly a steal for a digital subscription given the amount of high-quality content, even if I have my issues with it). |
|
|
|
Post by lcjjdnh on Jul 11, 2019 12:40:28 GMT
I don't subscribe to the WSJ anymore, so couldn't get through the paywall. Why do you hate when newspapers try to make money? Already auditioning for the gig you’re interviewing for...? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2019 14:46:17 GMT
When you lose the Daily Caller... I think that that headline and characterization is quite misleading. The correspondence itself is just lawyers talking, and by "bending over backward," he/she (I can't remember) just means that they made great pains to make sure the other side was aware of exactly what they were getting into, at all turns, and they don't feel like the professionalism and transparency had been reciprocated. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2019 16:51:54 GMT
Alright I'm not getting dragged into this shit on the Epstein thread. He is a serial sexual assaulter and you simply do not fucking care. You had some clearly identifiable principles in your politics before the 2016 election. It's exactly what happened to Kavanaugh -- who never met, or was in the same room as his accuser. Oh, Christ. I missed this gem. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2019 17:02:36 GMT
I didn't say don't give him any credit; I said there is no scenario where he was going to report on any connection that led back to Trump, no matter what the lawsuit said. He didn't do the hardest part of the actual reporting, but the Times should certainly mention him as having filed the actual lawsuit for sure. So, why didn’t they mention him? It can’t be an oversight. They certainly know who filed the suit. It had to be a conscious decision. I'm not saying you're wrong. Maybe you're right. But reading mainstream media legal stories from a lawyer's standpoint, I'm always surprised at the details that get left out. For example, stories hardly ever name the case, even Supreme Court cases. It's more than possible that they simply don't consider it particularly relevant that Cernovich filed the lawsuit. Even in the big cases, we often end up just getting a profile of the plaintiffs down the road, as a human interest bit. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2019 17:03:11 GMT
Maybe this has been covered earlier, but did anyone watch the Acosta press conference yesterday?
|
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Jul 11, 2019 18:03:20 GMT
Prominent #NeverTrumper spreads baseless rumor.
These are the people who find Trump to be vile, and unworthy of the presidency.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2019 18:11:37 GMT
Prominent #NeverTrumper spreads baseless rumor. These are the people who find Trump to be vile, and unworthy of the presidency. I denounce him. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2019 18:14:53 GMT
At least we know who @starman is now.
|
|
|
|
Post by mizzougrad96 on Jul 11, 2019 18:29:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Wolfenstein on Jul 12, 2019 13:53:18 GMT
Acosta says adios.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2019 14:08:38 GMT
|
|
