|
Post by oop on Feb 9, 2024 1:16:36 GMT
Do we have an Ivy League president in our midst? If I actually said their behavior was acceptable, that would make sense. I didn't. I just pointed out that y'all were ignoring the context, that she was the one who actually did some real damage.
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on Feb 9, 2024 1:18:22 GMT
Hod does she “get” her followers on TWITTER to call in bomb threats? Be specific. Read the article. You know how to do that, right? Or is moving past a Tweet to actually learn something too much for you? The article explains this? Quote?
|
|
|
Post by pallister on Feb 9, 2024 1:19:30 GMT
oop must have run away to Paris. Or I stopped looking at the board for two hours. Man, you really suck at this. Haha, made you respond!
|
|
|
Post by oop on Feb 9, 2024 1:22:46 GMT
Or I stopped looking at the board for two hours. Man, you really suck at this. Haha, made you respond! Yes, as I was responding to other posts on the thread, I pointed out your latest failure. Congratulations, little minnow.
|
|
|
Post by pallister on Feb 9, 2024 1:27:35 GMT
Yes, as I was responding to other posts on the thread, I pointed out your latest failure. Congratulations, little minnow. Ha, again!
|
|
|
Post by Whitman on Feb 9, 2024 1:33:22 GMT
You just told us that we needed to keep in mind the "context" when evaluating a SJ.com poster's suggestion that fire a nail into the base of another human being's skull, so as to ensure that she would be "dead before she hit the floor." Think you might like to rescind that suggestion, given some time to consider it now? If I took that as a serious suggestion, I would agree with you, but I don't. She actually did real damage. They blew off steam on the internet. I'm sorry you don't see the difference. I do have a problem with what they wrote and told them as much, but come on. I get that you have issues with SJ.com, but don't be this guy. You know better. I respect that you took the lead in calling them out on their posts. Good work.
|
|
|
Post by oop on Feb 9, 2024 3:01:50 GMT
If I took that as a serious suggestion, I would agree with you, but I don't. She actually did real damage. They blew off steam on the internet. I'm sorry you don't see the difference. I do have a problem with what they wrote and told them as much, but come on. I get that you have issues with SJ.com, but don't be this guy. You know better. I respect that you took the lead in calling them out on their posts. Good work. I've never shied away from calling people out there or here. I do tend to take a more complex view of things than some of y'all would like.
|
|
|
Post by pallister on Feb 9, 2024 4:05:36 GMT
I respect that you took the lead in calling them out on their posts. Good work. I've never shied away from calling people out there or here. I do tend to take a more complex view of things than some of y'all would like. There are not enough 🤣 in the world.
|
|
|
Post by oop on Feb 9, 2024 18:03:45 GMT
I've never shied away from calling people out there or here. I do tend to take a more complex view of things than some of y'all would like. There are not enough 🤣 in the world. I bet you were that kid in elementary school who understands nothing and tries to cover it up by laughing at everything. When do you think you might mature past that phase of your life?
|
|
|
Post by Vombatus on Feb 11, 2024 3:29:20 GMT
Laughter is a great way to enjoy life.
|
|
|
Post by btexpress on May 14, 2024 19:33:38 GMT
Doc crying at being "bullied" by Ragu (who in this case just offered a reasonable reply) just drips of . . . something.
He's a fucking Biff Tannen.
|
|
|
Post by Whitman on May 14, 2024 19:40:54 GMT
Doc crying at being "bullied" by Ragu (who in this case just offered a reasonable reply) just drips of . . . something. The "trolley problem" personified right here.
|
|
|
Post by YankeeFan on May 14, 2024 21:48:03 GMT
Doc crying at being "bullied" by Ragu (who in this case just offered a reasonable reply) just drips of . . . something. He's a fucking Biff Tannen. Had to take a look at that. Ragu is right about Maggie Haberman, and the Good Doctor -- and lots of liberals -- have been crazy about her for years. But Doc is right about responding to Ragu. If he wants to mix it up, he should take off his moderator hat.
|
|
|
Post by btexpress on May 14, 2024 21:56:33 GMT
What he described as "bullying" (in this specific response) was nothing of the kind.
It was a factual response without the "Fuck yous!" and name calling and insults that have been a Doc trademark for almost two decades (at least).
I've never received a PM from Ragu, so I have no idea what he ever says on those.
I was tickled at shottie calling Doc out, though, and that Doc's only reply was that shottie always hit back, too!
Well, I've NEVER responded to a single one of Doc's dozens of insults thrown my way, every single one of them unprovoked (in that I never respond to ANYTHING from Doc). And I was THISCLOSE to pointing it out. But that would spoil my 17-year streak of ignoring the colossal prick.
|
|
|
Post by Whitman on May 14, 2024 21:58:00 GMT
Doc crying at being "bullied" by Ragu (who in this case just offered a reasonable reply) just drips of . . . something. He's a fucking Biff Tannen. Had to take a look at that. Ragu is right about Maggie Haberman, and the Good Doctor -- and lots of liberals -- have been crazy about her for years. But Doc is right about responding to Ragu. If he wants to mix it up, he should take off his moderator hat. Shottie's right, though, about Doc McNeil: "You call people out more than anyone on this damn board, and you think you get to play 'bully's gonna bully'? FUCK that." Dead on.
|
|